Maryland Public Service Commission is to hold a hearing to consider the
impacts of using larger turbines at Ørsted’s 120 MW Skipjack
offshore wind farm and US Wind Inc.’s 268 MW MarWin
Original designs from 2016 for MarWin
listed the 4 MW Siemens turbine as the preliminary turbine model and Skipjack
reported that the Siemens 8 MW model was used to design the wind farm.
Earlier this year, US Wind notified the commission that it was evaluating
alternative models, including the SG
8.0 MW 167 DD,
10 MW 193 DD
and 12 MW General
Ørsted has also altered its plans and intends to install the 12 MW Haliade-X.
Several parties expressed concern over the potential visual and environmental
impacts of using larger turbines. US Wind filed a response contending that
its selection of a larger turbine will enable the project to utilize fewer
turbines, further from shore, and that final turbine selection will be
heavily scrutinized for impacts. Ørsted argues that its turbine selection
is consistent with its testimony in the original project designs to use
“the best-available turbine model.”
The commission has determined that changes to the turbine model and size
constitute material changes and that potential impacts will need to be
investigated. A public hearing has been scheduled for 18th January.
offshore wind farm is to be located in the ocean waters northeast of Ocean
City, 19.5 miles away from the Maryland-Delaware border. It is expected
to be completed by 2022 and generate enough energy to power 35,000 homes.
US Wind Inc.’s MarWin
is due online in 2023. This project was initially two separate lots, Maryland
North and Maryland south. US Wind plans to install turbines in waters 20-30
metres deep, approximately 17 miles off the coast of Ocean City.
For more information on offshore wind turbine developments, click
for our interactive map of offshore wind farms, infrastructure and ports.